Recruiter’s Questions

1. How do you approach learning new frontend technologies or frameworks?

Great Response: "I maintain a balanced approach between staying current and avoiding 'shiny object syndrome.' When learning a new technology, I first understand its purpose and how it solves existing problems. I'll build small proof-of-concept projects to test its capabilities, read documentation, and explore community discussions to understand best practices. For example, when learning React Query recently, I created a small app that demonstrated its data fetching capabilities compared to solutions I was already using. I also try to contribute to open source or participate in communities around technologies I'm learning, as teaching others solidifies my own understanding."

Mediocre Response: "I usually watch YouTube tutorials and follow along with code examples when I need to learn something new. If there's a new framework we're adopting at work, I'll read the documentation and try to implement it in my projects. Sometimes I'll also look at Stack Overflow if I get stuck on specific issues."

Poor Response: "I wait until I absolutely need to learn a new technology for work. When that happens, I'll find the quickest tutorial to get up and running and then figure things out as I go. I don't like to waste time learning things I might not use. I usually just copy code examples from documentation or Stack Overflow until things work."

2. Describe your experience with responsive design and how you implement it.

Great Response: "I follow a mobile-first approach, designing for the smallest screens initially and then progressively enhancing for larger viewports. I use CSS Grid and Flexbox as my primary layout tools, with strategic media queries at common breakpoints. Beyond just visual responsiveness, I consider performance implications by using responsive images with srcset and sizes, and ensure appropriate touch targets for mobile users. I also test across various devices and screen readers to ensure accessibility isn't compromised. In my last project, I implemented container queries for component-level responsiveness, which greatly improved maintainability of our design system."

Mediocre Response: "I use media queries and Bootstrap's grid system to make sites look good on different screen sizes. I test my designs on mobile and desktop to make sure everything fits and is usable. I also use relative units like percentages instead of fixed pixels for most measurements."

Poor Response: "I typically build for desktop first since that's what most of our users have, and then I add media queries to fix things that look broken on mobile. I rely heavily on frameworks like Bootstrap or Tailwind to handle the responsive part for me. If something doesn't work well on a particular device, I'll add custom CSS to fix that specific case."

3. Tell me about a time when you had to optimize a poorly performing webpage.

Great Response: "I inherited an e-commerce product page that was loading in over 8 seconds. I approached optimization systematically, first using Lighthouse and WebPageTest to identify key bottlenecks. The biggest issues were render-blocking JavaScript and oversized images. I implemented code splitting to load only critical JS initially, deferred non-essential scripts, and added proper image optimization with WebP format and lazy loading for below-the-fold content. I also detected and removed several redundant API calls. The most interesting challenge was addressing cumulative layout shift caused by dynamically loaded content. By pre-allocating space with aspect ratio containers, we reduced CLS by 85%. These combined efforts improved load time to under 2 seconds and raised our Lighthouse performance score from 42 to 92, which ultimately increased conversion rates by 15%."

Mediocre Response: "We had a page that was loading slowly, so I compressed the images and minified the CSS and JavaScript files. I also removed some unused libraries we were loading. Those changes helped speed things up enough that users stopped complaining about it being slow."

Poor Response: "When pages load slowly, I usually just look for big images that need compressing or third-party scripts that might be slowing things down. If that doesn't work, I'll ask our backend team to optimize their API responses. Most performance issues are either server problems or just users having slow internet connections, so there's only so much we can do on the frontend."

4. How do you stay organized when juggling multiple tasks and priorities?

Great Response: "I use a combination of systems that address different timeframes. For immediate tasks, I maintain a prioritized daily list with estimated completion times. For project-level work, I use a kanban approach to visualize workflow across teams. I've also developed a personal 'focus time' system where I block 2-3 hour chunks for deep work with no interruptions, which has dramatically improved my productivity on complex tasks. When priorities shift, I reassess impact and communicate changes to stakeholders. For example, when we recently had a critical bug emerge during a feature sprint, I quickly negotiated scope adjustments with product managers and documented the trade-offs, which helped maintain transparency while addressing the urgent issue."

Mediocre Response: "I keep a running to-do list and try to tackle the most important things first. When I get new tasks, I evaluate how urgent they are compared to what I'm already working on. I use our team's project management tool to track progress and make sure I don't miss deadlines."

Poor Response: "I focus on whatever has the closest deadline or whoever is asking most urgently for something. I try to work on one thing at a time and finish it before moving to the next task. If my manager tells me something is a priority, I'll switch to that. It can get overwhelming sometimes, but that's just how development work is."

5. How do you approach collaboration with designers?

Great Response: "I view the designer-developer relationship as a creative partnership rather than a handoff process. I engage with designers early, providing technical context that might influence design decisions before they're finalized. When implementing designs, I use tools like Figma's inspect mode to extract exact values, but I also maintain an ongoing dialogue about which aspects of the design are critical to preserve and where we might need flexibility for technical constraints or accessibility. For example, on our last project, I suggested adjusting the hover states to provide better focus indicators for keyboard users while maintaining the designer's aesthetic vision. This collaborative approach has reduced the implementation cycle and resulted in better experiences that honor the design vision while meeting technical requirements."

Mediocre Response: "I work closely with designers to understand their vision and try to implement it accurately. When I receive designs, I'll ask questions about any interactions that aren't clear and make sure I understand the responsive behavior. If something is particularly difficult to implement, I'll let them know and we'll find a compromise."

Poor Response: "I wait for designers to finalize their mockups and then implement them as closely as possible. If something is technically challenging, I'll make adjustments as needed without necessarily going back to the designer - they usually don't understand the technical limitations anyway. As long as it looks similar to the design, that's usually good enough."

6. Describe your approach to testing frontend code.

Great Response: "I believe in a comprehensive testing strategy that balances different types of tests for maximum confidence with minimal maintenance overhead. I write unit tests for complex logic using Jest, focusing on edge cases and maintaining high coverage for critical paths. For component testing, I use React Testing Library with a focus on testing behavior over implementation details. For critical user flows, I maintain a smaller suite of end-to-end tests with Cypress that run in CI. I've also implemented visual regression testing with Chromatic to catch unexpected UI changes. Recently, I've been exploring property-based testing for form validation logic, which has helped us discover edge cases we hadn't considered. The key is understanding which types of tests provide the most value for different parts of the application."

Mediocre Response: "I write unit tests for my components and utility functions using Jest and React Testing Library. I try to test the main functionality and user interactions to make sure things work as expected. For larger features, we have some end-to-end tests that run in our CI pipeline."

Poor Response: "I rely mostly on manual testing and QA to catch issues. Writing tests takes a lot of time, and with our tight deadlines, we focus more on delivering features. I'll write tests for critical functionality when I have time, but our QA team is pretty thorough. If a bug is found, then I'll add a test for that specific issue to prevent regression."

7. How do you handle technical disagreements with team members?

Great Response: "I approach technical disagreements as opportunities for team growth rather than conflicts to win. I start by seeking to understand their perspective fully, asking questions to clarify their reasoning. I focus on shared goals and objective criteria - performance metrics, maintainability, or user impact - rather than subjective preferences. For example, when debating state management approaches with a colleague, I suggested we create small prototypes of both solutions and evaluate them against agreed-upon criteria. This transformed what could have been an opinion-based argument into a collaborative learning experience. When a decision must be made, I respect the team's process, whether that's deferring to a tech lead or reaching consensus. I also believe in timeboxing debates - if we can't resolve quickly, we define what information would help us decide and reconvene when we have it."

Mediocre Response: "I try to explain my reasoning clearly and listen to their perspective. If we still disagree, I'll suggest finding evidence or examples that support each approach. Sometimes I'll compromise if it's not a critical issue. If we can't resolve it ourselves, we might ask a senior developer or tech lead for their opinion."

Poor Response: "I'll explain why my approach is better, and if they have good points, I might adjust my thinking. For minor issues, I'll often just go along with what they want to avoid conflict. If it's something I feel strongly about, I might implement it my way anyway if I'm the one writing the code. Most technical decisions don't matter that much in the long run as long as the feature works."

8. What strategies do you use to ensure your code is maintainable?

Great Response: "Maintainability starts with consistent architecture and clear patterns. I establish and document conventions for the team, like our component composition patterns and state management approaches. I'm a strong believer in the principle of least surprise - code should behave as other developers would expect. I write self-documenting code with descriptive variable names and break complex functions into smaller, single-purpose utilities. For component libraries, I use Storybook to document usage patterns and edge cases. I've found that regular refactoring sessions prevent technical debt accumulation - we schedule 'maintenance Fridays' every sprint to address emerging issues before they compound. The most important practice is thinking about the developer experience - I often ask 'How would a new team member understand this?' which guides decisions about abstraction levels and documentation needs."

Mediocre Response: "I try to follow our team's coding standards and use consistent naming conventions. I break down large functions into smaller ones and add comments to explain complex logic. I also try to avoid duplicating code by creating reusable components and utilities. When I make significant changes, I update documentation so others understand the system."

Poor Response: "I focus on getting features working first, and then clean up if there's time. I try to use descriptive names for functions and variables, but the most important thing is that the code works correctly. If something is particularly complex, I'll add comments explaining what it does. Other developers can always ask me if they have questions about how something works."

9. How do you approach accessibility in your frontend development?

Great Response: "I've integrated accessibility into every stage of my development process rather than treating it as an afterthought. I start with semantic HTML as the foundation, ensuring a logical document structure with appropriate landmarks. For interactive components, I implement keyboard navigation and ARIA attributes according to established patterns, testing with keyboard-only navigation and screen readers like VoiceOver and NVDA. I've created custom hooks for common accessibility patterns like keyboard traps for modals and announcement systems for dynamic content changes. Beyond technical implementation, I advocate for accessibility in planning discussions, helping product managers understand the impact of design decisions on diverse users. In my last role, I established an accessibility champions program where team members would rotate responsibility for auditing new features, which helped spread knowledge throughout the organization and prevent accessibility regressions."

Mediocre Response: "I use semantic HTML elements and add ARIA attributes when necessary. I make sure forms have proper labels and error messages, and I test tab navigation to ensure interactive elements are accessible by keyboard. I also pay attention to color contrast and font sizes to help users with visual impairments."

Poor Response: "I add alt tags to images and try to use the right HTML elements when I can. If the design team provides accessible color schemes, I implement those. We usually run an accessibility checker before launch to catch any major issues, and then fix the highest priority problems. Our company doesn't have many users with disabilities, so we focus more on features that benefit the majority of users."

10. Tell me about a challenging bug you had to solve. What was your process?

Great Response: "We encountered an intermittent issue where user sessions would unexpectedly terminate, but only on certain mobile devices and only after extended periods of activity. My debugging process started with reproducing the issue - I created an automated testing script that simulated long user sessions on various devices. Once I could reliably trigger the problem, I added extensive logging around authentication flows and storage mechanisms. The logs revealed that IndexedDB storage was being cleared unexpectedly, but only on iOS devices with low storage. After researching iOS's storage policies, I discovered Apple had implemented aggressive cache clearing for websites using over 50MB of storage. Our app was storing unnecessary historical data indefinitely. The solution required implementing a storage management system that prioritized critical session data and purged non-essential information when approaching storage limits. This experience taught me the importance of understanding platform-specific constraints and led us to create better storage guidelines for the entire team."

Mediocre Response: "We had a bug where certain users couldn't submit forms after updating to a new version. I started by looking at error logs and trying to reproduce the issue locally. After adding some console logs, I found that there was a validation error happening that wasn't being properly displayed to users. The problem turned out to be related to a change in our validation library's API that we hadn't fully updated for. I fixed it by updating our validation handlers and adding better error messaging."

Poor Response: "There was a bug where the page would crash for some users. I tried reproducing it on my machine but couldn't get it to happen. I eventually asked users what browser and operating system they were using and found out it was only happening on older versions of Safari. I added some code to detect Safari and disable some features for those users, which fixed the crashes. It wasn't an elegant solution, but it fixed the problem quickly so we could move on to other priorities."

11. How do you balance technical debt against delivery deadlines?

Great Response: "I view technical debt management as risk management, not an all-or-nothing proposition. When facing tight deadlines, I categorize technical debt into three buckets: debt that blocks future progress, debt that increases ongoing maintenance costs, and cosmetic debt with minimal impact. This prioritization helps make informed tradeoffs. For example, on our last major release, we identified that our state management approach would become unsustainable with planned features, so we allocated time for that refactoring despite timeline pressure. However, we delayed addressing some inconsistent styling patterns since they had minimal impact on development velocity. I've found it effective to negotiate 'technical debt budgets' with product stakeholders, where 15-20% of development time is explicitly allocated to maintenance. The key is transparent communication about the implications of each decision — not just saying 'we need more time,' but explaining specific risks and benefits in business terms."

Mediocre Response: "I try to find a middle ground by addressing critical technical debt that will impact future work while postponing less important clean-up tasks. If we're approaching a deadline, I'll focus on delivering the required features but document the technical debt we're accruing so we can address it in a future sprint. I also try to add small improvements incrementally alongside feature work."

Poor Response: "Meeting deadlines has to be the priority since that's what the business cares about most. I follow whatever approach gets the feature working fastest to meet the deadline, and then we can go back and clean things up later if there's time. In my experience, there's always another urgent feature waiting, so you just have to be practical about technical debt - it's part of every codebase."

12. Describe how you approach frontend performance optimization.

Great Response: "I take a metrics-driven approach to performance, focusing on Core Web Vitals as they correlate strongly with user experience. I start optimization work by establishing baselines through field data from real users (using tools like Google Analytics) combined with lab testing in controlled environments. For initial load performance, I implement code splitting to reduce JavaScript payload, optimize the critical rendering path, and use resource hints for early loading of critical assets. For runtime performance, I profile rendering bottlenecks with React DevTools and use techniques like virtualization for long lists, memoization for expensive calculations, and debouncing for frequent events. Beyond technical optimizations, I've found that creating team performance budgets and integrating performance monitoring into our CI pipeline prevents regressions. Recently, I've been exploring the partial hydration pattern to deliver interactive content faster while maintaining a component-based architecture, which has shown promising results for our content-heavy pages."

Mediocre Response: "I focus on common performance issues like minimizing bundle size, optimizing images, and reducing unnecessary re-renders in React components. I use tools like Lighthouse to identify performance bottlenecks and address the items with the biggest impact first. I also implement techniques like lazy loading for components that aren't needed on initial render."

Poor Response: "When users complain about performance, I look for obvious issues like large images or inefficient loops in the code. I use the Chrome developer tools to find bottlenecks if something is particularly slow. If the site is loading slowly, I'll typically compress assets and add some loading indicators to improve the perceived performance while users wait. Most performance issues come from the backend or server, so I focus on optimizing what I can control on the frontend."

13. How do you handle receiving critical feedback on your code?

Great Response: "I see code reviews as one of the most valuable tools for professional growth, so I actively seek substantial feedback rather than just approval. When receiving critical comments, I first make sure I fully understand the reviewer's perspective before responding. I ask clarifying questions when needed rather than defending my approach immediately. I've learned to separate my identity from my code - critique of my implementation isn't a personal criticism. For example, in a recent review where my component structure was questioned, I recognized it as an opportunity to learn about architectural patterns I hadn't considered. That said, I believe healthy debate is important, so if I have strong reasons for an implementation choice, I'll explain my reasoning clearly while remaining open to alternatives. The most important outcome isn't whether my original approach stays or changes, but that the team reaches the best solution and that everyone learns in the process."

Mediocre Response: "I try to be open to feedback and understand that other developers might have better approaches. I ask questions to understand their perspective and implement changes based on valid points. Sometimes I'll explain my reasoning if I think my approach has advantages they haven't considered, but I'm generally willing to adapt to team standards."

Poor Response: "I try not to take it personally, though it can be frustrating when someone criticizes code that's already working. I make the requested changes to keep the review process moving, even if I don't always agree with them. Sometimes there are multiple valid ways to solve a problem, and reviewers just prefer their own approach. I focus on getting approval so I can move on to the next task."

14. What considerations do you keep in mind when building forms for user input?

Great Response: "Forms represent critical user interactions, so I approach them holistically beyond just collecting data. I start with semantic HTML for accessibility and browser support, using appropriate input types, labels, and fieldsets. For validation, I implement a multi-layered approach: immediate inline validation for clear errors, submit-time validation for complex cross-field rules, and server validation as the source of truth. Error messages are positioned contextually near relevant fields and written in plain language explaining how to fix issues. For complex forms, I implement progressive disclosure to reduce cognitive load, and maintain form state to prevent data loss if users navigate away accidentally. I pay special attention to keyboard accessibility, ensuring logical tab order and adding appropriate ARIA attributes for screen readers. Performance is also critical - I debounce validation events and implement controlled components carefully to avoid excessive re-renders during typing. Recently, I've been using the React Hook Form library which addresses many of these concerns while reducing unnecessary re-renders."

Mediocre Response: "I make sure forms are accessible with proper labels and ARIA attributes when needed. I implement client-side validation with clear error messages and ensure forms can be submitted with keyboard navigation. I use appropriate input types like email and number to help with validation and provide the right mobile keyboard. For larger forms, I consider breaking them into logical sections to make them less overwhelming."

Poor Response: "I focus on making sure the form captures all the data we need and validates user input to prevent errors. I add required attributes to essential fields and use simple validation rules to check for proper formatting. If there are errors, I display messages so users know what to fix. I usually style forms according to the design mockups provided by the design team."

15. How do you approach learning from failures or mistakes in your work?

Great Response: "I've developed a structured reflection process for mistakes that focuses on growth rather than blame. After any significant issue, I document what happened objectively, the impact it had, and most importantly, the contextual factors that led to the mistake - because errors rarely happen in isolation. For example, after deploying a bug that affected our payment system, rather than just fixing the specific logic error, I examined why our testing hadn't caught it. This led to implementing stronger integration tests around payment flows and creating pre-deployment checklists for high-risk areas. I also believe in socializing learnings - I started 'failure retrospectives' where team members voluntarily share mistakes and lessons learned in a blame-free environment. This practice has dramatically improved our team's resilience and reduced repeat errors. The most important skill I've developed is distinguishing between errors of process versus knowledge gaps, as they require different remediation approaches."

Mediocre Response: "When I make a mistake, I try to understand exactly what went wrong and how to prevent it in the future. If it was due to a knowledge gap, I'll take time to study that area more thoroughly. If it was a process issue, I might suggest improvements to our workflow. I don't dwell on failures but use them as learning opportunities to become a better developer."

Poor Response: "I fix the issue as quickly as possible and move on. Everyone makes mistakes, and dwelling on them isn't productive. If someone points out a problem with my work, I make the necessary corrections and try to remember that approach for next time. The best way to avoid mistakes is to gain more experience, which happens naturally over time."

16. How do you approach mentoring junior developers?

Great Response: "My mentoring philosophy centers on creating sustainable growth rather than just solving immediate problems. I start by understanding the junior developer's current knowledge level, learning style, and career aspirations to tailor my approach. When answering questions, I focus on building mental models rather than providing quick fixes - explaining the 'why' behind solutions and connecting concepts to broader principles. I use the 'I do, we do, you do' framework: first demonstrating a technique, then pair programming on a similar challenge, then assigning a related task for independent practice with checkpoints. I've created a personal resource library of articles and examples for common challenges that I can share as supplementary material. The most important aspect is creating psychological safety - encouraging questions and normalizing not knowing things. Recently, I established weekly 'concept deep-dives' where we explore foundational topics like the event loop or rendering lifecycle in depth, which has accelerated the growth of several junior team members."

Mediocre Response: "I make time to answer questions and provide guidance on technical issues. I try to explain concepts clearly and point juniors to helpful resources. When reviewing their code, I provide detailed feedback explaining why certain approaches are better than others. I also try to give them increasingly challenging tasks that will help them grow their skills over time."

Poor Response: "I show junior developers the correct way to solve problems when they get stuck. I share links to relevant documentation and examples they can follow. When they make mistakes, I fix their code and explain what they did wrong so they learn the right way. I make sure they understand our existing patterns so they can follow the team's standards."

17. Describe your experience with state management in frontend applications.

Great Response: "I view state management as existing on a spectrum of complexity and have experience tailoring solutions to specific application needs. For simpler applications, I start with React's built-in state management (useState, useReducer, and Context), as it avoids unnecessary abstraction. When applications grow more complex, I evaluate whether we need global state or if we're facing a data synchronization problem. For true global state, I've implemented Redux with Redux Toolkit to reduce boilerplate, while for data fetching and caching, I prefer React Query or SWR which handle server state concerns like caching and revalidation elegantly. The most interesting challenge I've faced was in a complex form-heavy application where we needed to track many interdependent fields with derived values. We implemented a hybrid approach using Formik for form state with a custom middleware layer that synchronized critical values to our global store. I believe the key skill is recognizing which state belongs where - local component state, shared UI state, server cache, or true application state - and applying the appropriate tool for each category."

Mediocre Response: "I've used Redux for larger applications and Context API with useReducer for medium-sized projects. For smaller applications, component state with useState is usually sufficient. I try to keep related state together and lift state up when multiple components need access to the same data. I've also worked with MobX on one project, which had a different approach to state management."

Poor Response: "I usually use Redux for state management since it's the industry standard. It can be a bit complex to set up, but once it's in place, it works well for managing application state. For smaller components, I'll use local state with useState hooks. I follow the patterns established in the codebase and add new reducers and actions as needed for new features."

18. How do you approach cross-browser compatibility issues?

Great Response: "I tackle cross-browser compatibility systematically rather than reactively. I start with a solid foundation of progressive enhancement, ensuring core functionality works everywhere before adding enhancements. I maintain a browser support matrix based on our analytics data and business requirements, which guides feature implementation decisions. For CSS, I use PostCSS with autoprefixer configured to our browser targets, and implement graceful degradation for advanced features like CSS Grid with flexbox fallbacks. For JavaScript, I use Babel configured to our browser targets and feature-detect rather than browser-detect when implementing potentially unsupported APIs. I've established a multi-browser testing protocol that includes automated tests in our CI pipeline using Playwright across browser engines, plus manual testing on critical user paths for edge cases. Rather than endless pixel-perfect matching across browsers, I focus on ensuring equivalent functionality and acceptable visual presentation, which has proven more maintainable long-term."

Mediocre Response: "I test in major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, and Safari during development. I use tools like Can I Use to check feature compatibility and add polyfills when necessary. For CSS issues, I use autoprefixer to handle vendor prefixes automatically. When specific browser bugs arise, I research workarounds and document them in the code. We also have a set of browser requirements defined by our product team that helps set expectations."

Poor Response: "I develop primarily in Chrome and then check other browsers before deployment. If something doesn't work in older browsers, I add browser-specific fixes or polyfills as needed. Our analytics show most users are on modern browsers anyway, so I focus on making sure the experience is optimal for the majority rather than perfect everywhere. If users report issues in specific browsers, I'll investigate and fix those specific cases."

19. How do you balance creativity and consistency in your frontend development work?

Great Response: "I view creativity and consistency as complementary rather than competing forces. Consistency provides the foundation that makes creative solutions more effective and maintainable. I advocate for design systems and component libraries that establish guardrails while leaving room for innovation. When approaching new features, I first understand which elements need consistency for user familiarity and which offer opportunities for creative solutions. For example, in our recent product redesign, we maintained consistent navigation patterns while completely reimagining our data visualization components with creative interactions. To balance these forces organizationally, I helped establish an 'innovation budget' process where team members can propose experimental approaches that might diverge from standards if they solve user problems in superior ways. The successful experiments then feed back into our design system evolution. The key is recognizing that both values serve the ultimate goal of user experience - consistency reduces cognitive load while creativity solves problems in novel ways - and finding the appropriate balance for each specific challenge."

Mediocre Response: "I try to follow our design system and component patterns for consistency, but look for opportunities to innovate within those constraints. When I have ideas for new approaches, I discuss them with the team to see if they might improve the user experience. It's important to maintain a cohesive product feel while still evolving the interface over time. I document any new patterns we create so they can be reused consistently in the future."

Poor Response: "I stick to the established patterns most of the time because it's faster and ensures everything looks consistent. If I'm working on a new feature that doesn't have an established pattern, then I'll get creative with solutions. I think consistency is usually more important than creativity in production code, since users expect things to work in familiar ways. The design team handles most of the creative aspects anyway."

20. What questions do you have about our company or the role?

Great Response: "I'm interested in understanding how your team balances innovation with maintaining existing products. Could you share an example of how you've recently evolved your frontend architecture or introduced new technologies while managing technical debt? I'm also curious about your approach to measuring frontend success beyond shipping features - what metrics or outcomes do you use to evaluate the effectiveness of your frontend work? Finally, I'd love to hear about the collaboration model between product, design, and engineering - how early are engineers involved in the product development process, and how does that partnership typically work?"

Mediocre Response: "I'd like to know more about the tech stack you're currently using and if you have plans to adopt any new technologies. Also, could you describe the team structure and how work is typically assigned? And what would be the main priorities for someone in this role during the first few months?"

Poor Response: "What's the typical work schedule like, and how flexible are you with remote work? I'm also wondering about the promotion timeline and when I could expect to move up to a senior role. Could you tell me more about the benefits package and vacation policy as well?"