Engineering Manager’s Questions

Technical Questions

1. How do you handle memory management in mobile applications?

Great Response: "Memory management is critical for mobile performance. I use tools like Android Profiler or Xcode Instruments to proactively identify leaks. I'm careful with strong reference cycles in closures and delegates, implement proper deinit/onDestroy patterns, and use weak references when appropriate. For images, I implement caching and downsampling strategies based on device constraints. I've found that regular testing with memory graphs helps catch issues before they impact users, and I schedule periodic memory optimization sprints for our team."

Mediocre Response: "I follow standard patterns like avoiding memory leaks by managing lifecycle methods and using weak references when needed. I try to be mindful about large objects and I've used memory profiling tools when we encountered problems in production. Our QA team usually catches major memory issues during testing."

Poor Response: "I generally follow the framework's recommendations and haven't had many issues. If the app starts crashing, I'll look for memory leaks. Most modern phones have plenty of RAM these days, so I focus more on features and deadlines first. Our QA team is good at catching these kinds of issues before release."

2. Explain your approach to responsive design across different mobile screen sizes and resolutions.

Great Response: "I design with a constraint-based approach, using relative layouts and size classes rather than hard-coded values. I implement scaled design systems using density-independent pixels on Android and Auto Layout with size classes on iOS. For complex UIs, I create responsive breakpoints to reorganize elements, not just scale them. I maintain a testing matrix covering critical device sizes and resolutions, and use automated screenshot testing to ensure consistency. Each UI component is tested in isolation for responsiveness before integration."

Mediocre Response: "I use constraint layouts and avoid hardcoded dimensions in my layouts. I test on a few common screen sizes during development and make adjustments as needed. I usually create different layouts for phones and tablets to handle the major differences, and implement density-independent measurements for flexibility."

Poor Response: "I design for the most common screen size first and then adjust if there are issues on other devices. I use the emulator to test a couple of different sizes when I finish a feature. We have a standard set of devices we support, so I make sure it works on those and let QA handle the edge cases."

3. How do you optimize network requests in a mobile application?

Great Response: "I implement a multi-layered approach: First, I use efficient request batching and compression. I implement intelligent caching strategies with TTL policies based on data volatility. For images and media, I use progressive loading and downsampling based on connection quality, which I monitor continuously. I implement retry mechanisms with exponential backoff for unstable connections, and predictive prefetching for common user paths. I've also developed offline-first architectures that sync efficiently when connectivity returns, prioritizing critical data transmission."

Mediocre Response: "I use standard libraries like Retrofit or Alamofire with caching enabled. I compress payloads where possible and implement basic retry logic for failures. For images, I use libraries that handle caching and loading efficiently. I try to batch requests when possible to reduce overhead, and I'm careful with background requests to manage battery life."

Poor Response: "I use REST APIs with standard JSON parsing and make sure to handle errors properly. If performance becomes an issue, I'll look at implementing caching. Our backend team handles most of the optimization on their side. As long as we show loading indicators to users, they're usually fine waiting a second or two for data to load."

4. How do you approach testing for mobile applications?

Great Response: "I implement a comprehensive testing pyramid: unit tests for business logic with 80%+ coverage, integration tests for component interaction, and UI tests for critical user flows using Espresso/XCTest. I've set up screenshot testing to catch visual regressions and incorporate accessibility testing in our CI pipeline. For stability, I implement stress testing with tools like Monkey on Android. We also do targeted performance testing for critical paths and beta testing with feature flags to gather real-world data. Every feature has test criteria defined before development begins."

Mediocre Response: "I write unit tests for the more complex parts of the codebase and UI tests for the main user flows. I manually test on a couple of device configurations before submitting code for review. We have some CI checks in place that run the tests automatically. For larger features, we might do a beta release to catch issues before wider deployment."

Poor Response: "I test my features manually on my development device to make sure they work as expected. Our QA team has a thorough process for finding bugs before release. Writing tests takes a lot of time, so I focus on delivering features and then add tests if we have time. Most bugs can be caught through code review and manual testing anyway."

5. How do you ensure your mobile application is accessible to all users?

Great Response: "Accessibility is integrated from design through implementation. I use semantic markup for screen readers (TalkBack/VoiceOver), ensure proper focus order and navigation, and maintain appropriate contrast ratios (WCAG AA standards). I implement proper content scaling for different text sizes and test with various assistive technologies. I've created custom components when native ones lack accessibility features. Our CI pipeline includes automated accessibility checks, and we conduct regular sessions with actual users who rely on assistive technologies. I also ensure proper labeling of UI elements and avoid time-based interactions that might be difficult for some users."

Mediocre Response: "I follow the platform accessibility guidelines and make sure text has sufficient contrast. I add content descriptions to images and important UI elements for screen readers. We test VoiceOver and TalkBack on the main user flows before releases. When the design team provides accessibility requirements, I implement them according to spec."

Poor Response: "I use the standard UI components which have accessibility built-in. If specific accessibility features are requested, I can implement them. Our design team handles most of the accessibility considerations like contrast and text size. Since most of our users don't require accessibility features, we focus on the core functionality first."

6. Describe your approach to handling app state and data flow in a complex mobile application.

Great Response: "I implement unidirectional data flow architectures like Redux/MVI where state changes are predictable and traceable. I use immutable state models and pure functions for state transitions, making debugging and testing simpler. For complex apps, I segment state by feature module with clear interfaces between them. I implement state restoration for process death and app backgrounding. For persistence, I use Room/Core Data with repositories that abstract data sources. I've built observability tools that track state transitions for debugging, and implement proper error states with recovery paths. This approach has helped us maintain a complex app with 50+ screens while keeping the codebase maintainable."

Mediocre Response: "I typically use an MVVM architecture with LiveData or Combine to propagate changes. I try to keep state management centralized in view models and use repositories to handle data operations. For persistence, I use SQLite or Core Data depending on the platform. I make sure to handle configuration changes like rotation by saving state properly."

Poor Response: "I use a standard MVC pattern and pass data between controllers as needed. Each screen manages its own state, which keeps things simple and isolated. For data that needs to be shared, I use singletons or static utilities. When we need to persist data, I use the platform's standard storage options like SharedPreferences or UserDefaults."

7. How do you optimize app startup time and performance?

Great Response: "I approach this systematically: First, I measure baseline performance with tools like Android Vitals or Xcode Instruments to identify bottlenecks. I implement lazy initialization of non-critical components and prioritize rendering the initial UI before background work. I use compile-time dependency injection to avoid runtime reflection costs, optimize image loading with proper caching and downsampling, and implement code splitting with dynamic feature modules or on-demand resources. I've reduced our app's cold start from 3.5s to under 1s by moving heavy initialization off the main thread, deferring network calls, and implementing progressive loading patterns. We track startup time as a core metric in our analytics."

Mediocre Response: "I try to minimize work done on the main thread during startup and use background threads for data loading. I make sure to optimize any slow database queries and avoid blocking I/O operations during launch. I use tools like Systrace or Time Profiler to identify bottlenecks when we notice slowdowns. We also try to defer network calls until after the UI is visible."

Poor Response: "I focus on loading the essential features first and showing a splash screen to give the app time to initialize. If users complain about slow startup, I'll look at the initialization code to see what might be causing delays. Most modern phones are fast enough that startup time isn't usually a big concern unless you're doing something really intensive."

8. How do you handle security concerns in mobile development?

Great Response: "Security is multifaceted: I implement proper data encryption at rest using the Keystore/Keychain for sensitive information and secure communication with certificate pinning and TLS 1.3. I use code obfuscation tools like ProGuard/DexGuard with custom rules to protect intellectual property. For authentication, I implement biometrics when available, with secure fallbacks and proper token management. I conduct regular security audits using tools like MobSF and follow OWASP Mobile Top 10 guidelines. I've implemented jailbreak/root detection with multiple layers and runtime integrity checks. We also have a bug bounty program and work with security researchers to continuously improve our posture."

Mediocre Response: "I make sure to use HTTPS for all network communication and encrypt sensitive data stored on the device. I validate all user inputs and sanitize data coming from external sources. For authentication, I implement token-based approaches with secure storage. I try to follow the security guidelines provided by Apple and Google and keep up with common vulnerabilities."

Poor Response: "I use the standard security features provided by the frameworks and make sure passwords aren't stored in plaintext. We use HTTPS for our API calls and let the backend team handle most of the security concerns. If we need specific security features, I'll implement them according to requirements. Our security team does periodic reviews of the app before major releases."

9. How do you manage dependencies and third-party libraries in your mobile projects?

Great Response: "I take a strategic approach to dependency management. Before adding any library, I evaluate its maintenance status, community support, security history, and performance impact. I use dependency management tools like Gradle or CocoaPods with strict version pinning and lockfiles to ensure reproducible builds. I implement modular architecture that isolates third-party code behind interfaces, making replacements easier. For critical dependencies, I maintain fallback implementations. I've created a regular dependency audit process that reviews usage, updates, and security vulnerabilities, and we maintain an internal 'approved libraries' list with documentation about why each was chosen. This has helped us avoid technical debt and security issues from abandoned libraries."

Mediocre Response: "I use dependency management tools to keep track of libraries and try to keep them updated regularly. Before adding a new library, I check its popularity and maintenance status. I prefer well-established libraries with good documentation and active support. For major dependencies, I make sure they're compatible with our minimum supported OS versions and test thoroughly when upgrading."

Poor Response: "I use popular libraries to avoid reinventing the wheel and save development time. When I need a new feature, I search for libraries that can help and integrate the ones with good documentation. I update dependencies when we encounter issues or when preparing for a major release. Our build system manages the dependencies automatically."

10. How do you implement offline capabilities in mobile applications?

Great Response: "I design for offline-first from the beginning with a local-first data architecture. I implement robust data synchronization using CRDTs or custom merge resolution strategies for conflict handling. I use a combination of SQLite/Realm with change tracking for efficient delta syncs. For media content, I implement smart prefetching based on user behavior patterns and network conditions. I've built queue-based systems for pending operations that retry with exponential backoff when connectivity returns, prioritizing critical user actions. Each feature has defined offline behavior and clear UI states to communicate sync status to users. This approach has allowed our users to continue working seamlessly regardless of connectivity."

Mediocre Response: "I implement caching for API responses and store essential data locally using SQLite or Core Data. When the app detects it's offline, it falls back to cached data and shows appropriate messaging to users. For critical actions, I queue them locally and sync when connectivity is restored. I make sure to handle conflict resolution when syncing data that might have changed on the server."

Poor Response: "I cache the most recent data so users can see something when they're offline. For essential features, I add error handling that notifies users when they're offline and need to reconnect. Most mobile users have reliable connections these days, so we focus on the online experience first and add offline support for key features if it's specifically requested."

Behavioral/Cultural Fit Questions

1. Tell me about a time when you had to make a difficult technical decision with limited information. How did you approach it?

Great Response: "Last year, we needed to decide whether to refactor our networking layer or continue with incremental improvements as performance issues grew. With a major release looming, I couldn't spend weeks researching. I organized a focused investigation: I identified three potential approaches and created small proof-of-concepts for each, measuring key metrics. I consulted with team members who had relevant experience and reached out to my professional network for perspectives. I documented trade-offs in a decision matrix considering short and long-term impacts, development costs, and risks. Based on this structured approach, we chose a middle path—implementing a partial refactor focused on the highest-impact areas first. This improved performance by 40% within our timeline constraints while setting us up for further improvements later. The key was balancing thorough analysis with pragmatic time constraints."

Mediocre Response: "We had to decide between two UI frameworks for a new feature with tight deadlines. I researched both options online, looked at their documentation, and discussed it with a few team members. I made a list of pros and cons for each and ultimately went with the option that seemed to have better community support. It worked out fine for our needs, though we did encounter some integration challenges we hadn't anticipated."

Poor Response: "When choosing a charting library for our analytics feature, I went with the one I had used before to save time on the research phase. I knew it would meet our basic requirements, and we had a tight deadline. There were some limitations we discovered later, but by then we were committed to the implementation. The feature shipped on time, which was the main priority for our product manager."

2. How do you handle feedback on your code during code reviews?

Great Response: "I view code reviews as collaborative learning opportunities rather than just quality gates. I separate feedback into categories—architectural, functional, stylistic—and address them with appropriate priority. For substantive feedback, I discuss the reasoning behind both the original approach and the suggestion, focusing on understanding different perspectives rather than defending my code. I maintain a personal document of recurring feedback patterns to improve over time. When receiving suggestions I'm unsure about, I implement proof-of-concepts to test both approaches objectively. I also practice active appreciation—thanking reviewers for specific insights that improved my code. This mindset has turned code reviews from potential friction points into our team's most valuable knowledge-sharing mechanism."

Mediocre Response: "I try to be open to suggestions and implement the changes requested unless I have a strong reason not to. If I disagree with feedback, I'll explain my reasoning politely and see if we can reach a consensus. I appreciate when reviewers find issues I missed, as it helps prevent bugs from reaching production. I try to learn from the feedback to improve my future code."

Poor Response: "I implement the required changes to get my code approved. If there are suggestions I don't agree with, I'll make them anyway to avoid delays in the process. The most important thing is getting features shipped quickly. Sometimes reviewers get too hung up on minor details or prefer their own coding style, but I try not to take it personally."

3. Describe how you stay current with mobile development trends and best practices.

Great Response: "I maintain a multifaceted learning system that balances depth and breadth. I dedicate 3-5 hours weekly to structured learning, rotating focus areas monthly between core skills, emerging technologies, and adjacent domains. I actively participate in two mobile development communities where I both answer questions and post my own challenges. I follow a curated list of 15 technical blogs and contribute to open-source projects that expose me to different codebases and approaches. I've established a peer learning group at work where we share articles and conduct mini workshops on new techniques. Most valuably, I implement experimental projects to apply new concepts in practice—recently building a small app using the latest architectural patterns and UI toolkit to truly understand their benefits and limitations firsthand. This combination of theoretical and applied learning ensures I'm not just aware of new developments but can evaluate their practical value."

Mediocre Response: "I follow several mobile development blogs and subscribe to newsletters that highlight new features and best practices. I try to watch conference videos when I can and occasionally experiment with new libraries or frameworks in my spare time. I also learn from my colleagues and through code reviews where I see different approaches."

Poor Response: "I learn what I need to when project requirements demand it. If we decide to adopt a new technology, I'll read the documentation and tutorials to get up to speed. There are so many trends that come and go, so I focus on mastering the fundamentals rather than chasing every new framework. My company provides training when necessary for new tools we're adopting."

4. Tell me about a time you had to work with a difficult team member. How did you handle it?

Great Response: "I worked with a senior developer who was technically brilliant but often dismissed others' ideas without consideration and communicated harshly in code reviews. Rather than avoiding him or escalating immediately, I first sought to understand the root causes. I noticed patterns—he was most dismissive when under deadline pressure and with newer technologies. I approached him in a one-on-one setting, acknowledging his technical expertise while sharing specific examples of how his communication style impacted team collaboration. I suggested we try a different approach for our next feature: pair programming on the initial architecture to combine his experience with my fresh perspective. This collaborative start led to mutual respect as he saw value in my ideas, and I learned from his experience. I also introduced a team practice of 'proposal reviews' before implementation, creating a space to discuss approaches constructively. Over three months, our working relationship transformed from tense to truly collaborative, and team velocity increased as others felt more comfortable contributing ideas."

Mediocre Response: "I had a colleague who would often make last-minute changes to requirements without communicating clearly. I scheduled regular check-ins with them to make sure we were aligned on expectations and requirements. I also started documenting our discussions in writing to avoid misunderstandings. Over time, our communication improved, and there were fewer surprises near deadlines."

Poor Response: "I worked with someone who was very particular about code style and would leave lengthy comments on minor issues. I just made the changes they requested to avoid conflict, even when I disagreed. I focused on my own work and tried to minimize interactions where possible. Eventually, they moved to another team, which resolved the situation naturally."

5. How do you balance quality and speed when delivering mobile features?

Great Response: "I approach this as a continuous optimization problem rather than a fixed trade-off. First, I establish clear quality thresholds for different aspects of the work—crash-free rate, performance benchmarks, and test coverage—below which we won't ship regardless of deadlines. Then I prioritize quality investments based on risk and user impact, applying more rigorous practices to core features and data integrity than to experimental features. I've developed a set of reusable components and automated processes that enable us to move quickly without sacrificing quality. When tight deadlines require compromises, I create explicit technical debt tickets with remediation plans rather than letting quality issues accumulate invisibly. Most importantly, I maintain metrics on both delivery speed and quality outcomes, allowing us to identify patterns where certain practices actually improve both dimensions simultaneously—like our investment in automated testing, which initially slowed us but now enables faster, more confident releases. This data-driven approach has helped us increase release frequency by 40% while reducing customer-reported issues by 25%."

Mediocre Response: "I try to find a reasonable middle ground based on the project's needs. For critical features, I emphasize thorough testing and code quality. For less critical features or when facing tight deadlines, I might focus on meeting core requirements first and plan for improvements in future iterations. I communicate with product managers about the trade-offs involved so we can make informed decisions together."

Poor Response: "Meeting deadlines is usually the top priority, so I focus on delivering working features on time. We can always improve quality in subsequent releases once we get user feedback. I prioritize features that users will notice and sometimes cut corners on internal code quality if necessary to meet release dates. Having something in users' hands is better than a perfect solution that's delayed."

6. Describe your approach to mentoring junior developers.

Great Response: "My mentorship philosophy centers on balancing structured guidance with autonomy for growth. I begin by understanding the junior developer's current skills, learning style, and career aspirations through regular 1:1s. I create personalized learning paths with progressively challenging assignments that stretch their abilities without overwhelming them. For technical skills, I use a combination of pair programming sessions where I demonstrate approaches in real-time, code reviews with detailed constructive feedback, and guided troubleshooting where I ask leading questions rather than providing immediate solutions. Beyond coding, I intentionally expose them to the full software development lifecycle, including involving them in architectural discussions and stakeholder communications with appropriate scaffolding. I measure success not by how dependent they become on my guidance, but by their growing confidence in solving problems independently. One of my proudest achievements was watching a junior developer I mentored lead a critical feature implementation after six months, applying principles we'd discussed but finding her own innovative solutions to problems we hadn't anticipated."

Mediocre Response: "I try to be available for questions and provide clear explanations when junior developers get stuck. I review their code thoroughly and provide constructive feedback on how to improve. I encourage them to work on different parts of the codebase to build broader knowledge, and I share useful resources or articles I think would help them learn. I also make sure they understand the reasoning behind our technical decisions."

Poor Response: "I assign appropriate tasks based on their skill level and provide guidance when they ask for help. I try to answer their questions clearly and point them to documentation when available. We have a good onboarding process that covers most of what they need to know, and they can learn a lot by working with the existing codebase. I make myself available if they're really stuck on something."

7. How do you approach planning and estimating work for mobile development projects?

Great Response: "I use a multi-layered estimation approach that balances accuracy with efficiency. For initial project scoping, I break features into functional components and map them against similar past work, adjusting for known differences in complexity. I involve the entire development team in collaborative planning poker sessions, which surfaces differing assumptions we need to reconcile. For high-uncertainty areas, I advocate for time-boxed spikes to reduce risk before final estimation. I maintain a team estimation accuracy database that helps us recognize and correct for common biases—we discovered we consistently underestimate UI animation work by 30% and now adjust accordingly. I separate 'must-have' features from 'nice-to-haves' early and design modular implementation plans that deliver core value first. Most importantly, I've learned to build appropriate buffers for integration challenges and feedback cycles while maintaining transparency with stakeholders about confidence levels in different parts of the estimate. This approach has improved our estimation accuracy from 60% to 85% over the past year while keeping planning overhead reasonable."

Mediocre Response: "I break down features into smaller tasks and estimate each based on my experience with similar work. I usually add some buffer time for unexpected challenges and testing. I try to get input from team members who might have more experience with particular areas of the codebase. For larger projects, I create a rough timeline with milestones and adjust as we progress and learn more about the requirements."

Poor Response: "I estimate based on how long similar features have taken in the past and then add some extra time for testing and bug fixes. If the product team needs something sooner, I focus on the core functionality first. It's hard to be too precise with estimates since requirements often change during development, so I prefer to start building quickly and adjust timelines as needed."

8. Tell me about a time when you had to make a significant technical compromise to meet business needs. How did you handle it?

Great Response: "Last year, our team faced a critical situation when a major client needed an AR feature for a product launch in six weeks, though our initial estimate was three months. Rather than simply cutting corners or refusing, I developed a stratified approach. First, I facilitated a workshop with product and client stakeholders to identify the core user value versus enhanced capabilities, which helped us define a minimally viable implementation that would still deliver meaningful value. I then architected a solution with clear separation between core components and extensibility points, allowing us to deliver the essential experience on time while designing for future enhancements. We implemented comprehensive telemetry to measure real-world performance and usage patterns. Critically, I clearly communicated the technical trade-offs to leadership, documenting the deferred work and potential limitations of our expedited approach. We delivered on time, but I also scheduled a technical debt remediation sprint two releases later, where we refactored based on actual usage data rather than hypothetical concerns. This balanced approach satisfied immediate business needs while preserving long-term code health, and actually informed a more streamlined architecture than our original plan."

Mediocre Response: "We needed to add a critical payment feature before a seasonal sales peak, but our payment provider's SDK had serious performance issues on older devices. With limited time, I implemented a simplified version that covered the core functionality but lacked some nice-to-have features. I documented the limitations and created tickets for the improvements we'd need to make after the sales period. The solution worked well enough for the immediate need, and we were able to enhance it properly in the following quarter."

Poor Response: "To meet a tight deadline for a marketing campaign, I had to implement a feature without our usual level of testing and refinement. I focused on making sure the basic functionality worked and that it wouldn't crash the app, knowing we could fix any minor issues in the next release. The marketing team got their feature on time, and while we did have to make some fixes afterward, it didn't cause any major problems for users."

9. How do you handle disagreements about technical approaches within your team?

Great Response: "I view technical disagreements as opportunities to arrive at stronger solutions through diverse perspectives. When conflicts arise, I first ensure we're defining the problem consistently and evaluating approaches against shared criteria—performance, maintainability, timeline impact, etc. I create a structured space for each person to articulate their reasoning fully before any debate begins. For significant architectural decisions, I've found success with a modified ADR (Architecture Decision Record) process where we document alternatives with their pros and cons objectively. When appropriate, I advocate for small proof-of-concepts to test critical assumptions rather than relying solely on theoretical debates. If I'm personally invested in an approach, I'm careful to separate my role as a team member advocating a position from any leadership role facilitating the decision process. The most productive disagreements occur when we maintain curiosity about others' reasoning and recognize that different technical backgrounds naturally lead to different solution preferences. This approach recently helped us navigate a contentious decision about state management patterns, where the hybrid solution we ultimately adopted proved superior to any of our initial positions."

Mediocre Response: "I try to focus technical discussions on objective criteria like performance, maintainability, and alignment with project requirements. I present my reasoning clearly and listen to others' perspectives. If we can't reach consensus, I'm willing to compromise or defer to more experienced team members on their areas of expertise. For important decisions, I suggest documenting the options we considered and the reasoning behind our final choice for future reference."

Poor Response: "I explain my preferred approach and the reasons behind it. If others have different ideas, we usually go with what the most senior developer or tech lead prefers to avoid prolonged debates. Having a clear decision-maker helps us move forward quickly instead of getting stuck in discussions. The most important thing is agreeing on an approach and sticking with it consistently."

10. How do you prioritize your work when dealing with multiple competing demands?

Great Response: "I approach prioritization as a dynamic optimization problem rather than a static list. I maintain a framework that weighs multiple factors: business impact, technical urgency (like dependencies blocking others), opportunity cost of delay, and alignment with strategic goals. I hold brief daily self-planning sessions to reassess priorities as new information emerges. For competing demands from different stakeholders, I facilitate transparent conversations about trade-offs rather than making unilateral decisions. I've developed a 'decision journal' to track prioritization choices and their outcomes, which has helped me recognize patterns and improve my judgment over time. I also distinguish between types of work that require different mental modes—deep focus coding vs. collaborative design vs. quick reviews—and batch similar activities to minimize context switching. When truly overloaded, I proactively negotiate scope or deadlines rather than compromising quality or burning out. This systematic approach has allowed me to consistently deliver high-impact work while remaining responsive to emerging needs and maintaining sustainable work patterns."

Mediocre Response: "I organize tasks based on urgency and importance, focusing first on critical issues that could block others or impact users. I try to communicate clearly with stakeholders about my capacity and current commitments. When priorities conflict, I discuss with my manager or product owner to get clarity on what should take precedence. I also try to set aside time for important but non-urgent tasks like technical debt reduction so they don't keep getting deferred."

Poor Response: "I handle the most urgent requests first, especially when they come from senior leadership or important clients. I try to be responsive to whoever needs help most immediately. For my assigned development work, I focus on meeting the deadlines in our sprint commitments. If I can't get to everything, I let my manager know so they can help adjust expectations or reassign work."

These interview questions and response examples should help engineering managers evaluate mobile development candidates on both technical skills and cultural fit, with realistic expectations for responses that can be delivered in under 5 minutes.